<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canadian&#8217;s Don&#8217;t Care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theontarion.com/2010/01/canadians-dont-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theontarion.com/2010/01/canadians-dont-care/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:10:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: walter kronkite</title>
		<link>http://www.theontarion.com/2010/01/canadians-dont-care/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>walter kronkite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theontarion.com/?p=149#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Im sorry but the science IS still debatable on this issue of climate change.  though you have my full support behind the pollution of the athabascka river and what it is doing to the native populations there.  simply an issue of property rights, if they own it, then these companies have no right to pollute it-case closed.

but as far as this diatribe about starving africans and how it is &quot;us&quot; who are doing it to them... thats a bit ridiculous dont you think?  not lowering C02 means that african children are starving?  If anything I would say imposing limits on commerce would add to their suffering.  slash and burn and irresponsible agricultural policies in africa is why they have no food.  perfect example is zimbabwe. not to mention african women have on average around 6-7 children each...why do they have so many if they cant feed them?  this isn&#039;t the result of the tar sands in Alberta...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im sorry but the science IS still debatable on this issue of climate change.  though you have my full support behind the pollution of the athabascka river and what it is doing to the native populations there.  simply an issue of property rights, if they own it, then these companies have no right to pollute it-case closed.</p>
<p>but as far as this diatribe about starving africans and how it is &#8220;us&#8221; who are doing it to them&#8230; thats a bit ridiculous dont you think?  not lowering C02 means that african children are starving?  If anything I would say imposing limits on commerce would add to their suffering.  slash and burn and irresponsible agricultural policies in africa is why they have no food.  perfect example is zimbabwe. not to mention african women have on average around 6-7 children each&#8230;why do they have so many if they cant feed them?  this isn&#8217;t the result of the tar sands in Alberta&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
